Nanonets
- Nanonets: extraction specialist. The result stays in that product context.
vs Nanonets
No-code IDP vs. open catalog: 69 types and an end-to-end archive path.
Made for real business. Not for hype.
In the same account
AI OCR with bounding boxes — 69 types, fields with location.
from €6 per 1,000 pages
Seamless in the job path — task and document also on mobile.
Web + Mobile
SES signatures from the same credit balance.
SES from the balance
Audit-proof filing and audit trail.
included
Nanonets publishes tiers; the table shows the billing model (as of 09/2026).
| Criterion | PaperOffice | Nanonets |
|---|---|---|
| Bounding boxes (word/line level) | Yes (word/line level, Surya OCR) | n/a |
| Sandwich PDF / searchable archive PDF | Yes — searchable archive PDF | n/a |
| Click-to-evidence / visual validation (HITL) | Yes — click-to-evidence / HITL | review in Nanonets workflows |
| Structured IDP fields (ready types) | Zero-shot: any document type, 120+ languages | OCR/IDP pipelines (block metering) |
| DMS/archive included (WORM, audit, legal hold) | Yes — WORM, audit trail, legal hold | no — no document archive, external archive required |
| E-signatures on the same document | Yes — on the same document in the archive | no |
| Native MCP server (tool count) | Yes — 300+ API/MCP Tools | MCP server only for the open-source docstrange library (GitHub), not for the IDP platform itself (as of 09/2026) |
| EU inference on owned hardware | Yes — owned EU GPU hardware | US vendor — optional EU data region (region pinning), not an EU company |
| Self-service without cloud setup | Yes — token in minutes | Starter free + Growth quote |
| Pricing model | One credit balance for all features: from €6.00–€60.00 per 1,000 pages by quality tier | Usage-based (pages/credits) plus subscription tiers; free entry tier |
| List price per 1,000 pages | Basic €20.00 / Premium €60.00 / Ultra €200.00 per 1,000 pages (2/6/20¢) | Usage-based (pages/credits) + subscription tiers |
| Billing | from €6.00 per 1,000 pages (Elite) — same scale on every tier | n/a |
Source: https://nanonets.com/pricing, retrieved 09/2026. Prices may change.
Nanonets is a trademark of its respective owner. PaperOffice is not affiliated with or endorsed by Nanonets. Competitor details are based on publicly available sources (as of 08/2026) and are provided without warranty.
Our prices are public — including partner terms.
Unit: Price per 1,000 pages
| Tier | Elite Partner (−70%) | Partner (−40%) | Enduser |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | €6.00 | €12.00 | €20.00 |
| Premium | €18.00 | €36.00 | €60.00 |
| Ultra | €60.00 | €120.00 | €200.00 |
Billing is internal in credits; amounts follow the selected currency (base: list price).
Elite terms after qualification — criteria and program are public: Pricing · Partner program
For no-/low-code document models with a Nanonets workflow focus, Nanonets can be the better studio choice — when the team already maintains models there.
When API-first document processes with DMS and MCP matter, PaperOffice is the better fit.
Trusted by leading companies worldwide
The result from Nanonets stays in that product context. PaperOffice keeps extraction and archive on the same document.
Aktuelles Modell: Credit-/Block-basiert — pro Run (einfach), (Standard-AI), (komplexe AI/Extraktion); Nanonets' eigenes Rechnungsbeispiel: unter pro Invoice end-to-end. With PaperOffice result, archive and further processing live in one account with one credit balance.
Nanonets returns the result in its own product model. PaperOffice runs its own EU servers and files the result in an audit-proof way.
https://api.paperoffice.ai/latest/docs/llms-full.txt Or connect directly: MCP server for Claude, Cursor and ChatGPT →
Invoice extraction
curl -X POST "https://api.paperoffice.ai/latest/job/add/workflow" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer po_sk_xxx" \ -F "file=@./invoice.pdf" \ -F "model=premium" \ -F "idp_collection=invoice" # danach job_result pollen (job_id aus Response) import requests api_token = "po_sk_xxx"
file_path = "invoice.pdf" create = requests.post( "https://api.paperoffice.ai/latest/job/add/workflow", headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {api_token}"}, files={"file": open(file_path, "rb")}, data={"model": "premium", "idp_collection": "invoice"},
)
print(create.json()) { "status": "success", "job_id": "job_…", "result": { "fields": { "invoice_number": "…" } }
} Full parameters: llms-full.txt / Postman.
Yes. PaperOffice AI can be evaluated as an alternative to Nanonets — along extraction, processing on own servers in the EU, DMS/WORM and MCP, API-first.
Basic 2¢, Premium 6¢, Ultra 20¢ per page — PaperOffice’s price list is public. Nanonets also publishes tiers; the table shows the billing model.
Nanonets primarily solves the core job described on this page. PaperOffice keeps extraction, archive (WORM), permissions, HITL and MCP on the same document — with a public per-page price list.
Typical cutover from Nanonets: send the same files to PaperOffice workflows (e.g. idp_collection=invoice), run in parallel, then cut over. llms-full.txt: job/workflow.
On our own servers in the EU — including audit-proof filing and an audit trail. Where Nanonets processes data is documented by the vendor.
Ready IDP pipelines (incl. invoice) plus DMS/HITL/MCP versus Nanonets — not raw extraction only. Fastest with llms-full.txt.
Another comparison in the same category as Nanonets.
PaperOffice vs Konfuzio →Another comparison in the same category as Nanonets.
PaperOffice vs Rossum →Another comparison in the same category as Nanonets.
PaperOffice vs ABBYY (Vantage / FlexiCapture) →Another comparison in the same category as Nanonets.
PaperOffice vs Mistral OCR 4 →Another comparison in the same category as Nanonets.
PaperOffice vs Klippa DocHorizon →Another comparison in the same category as Nanonets.
PaperOffice vs Mindee →Get a token, review pricing, compare the feature matrix.