AI-DMS — UI · Chat Agent · API
Web · Desktop · Mobile The app for teams — capture, search and approve documents. Claude · ChatGPT · Cursor Use PaperOffice via chat — same workspaces and permissions. REST · MCP · one API key All capabilities for developers — one platform, one key.vs Klippa DocHorizon (Doxis AI.dp)
Klippa DocHorizon → Doxis AI.dp (SER, 03/2026): sales-led ECM module — PaperOffice stays API-first self-service.
Klippa DocHorizon was acquired by SER Group in 03/2025 and rebranded to Doxis AI.dp in 03/2026 — now a module in an enterprise ECM suite. PaperOffice stays an independent API-first platform with self-service pricing. Related comparison: Doxis AI.dp.
Unverified competitor data appears as “n/a”.
| Criterion | PaperOffice | Klippa DocHorizon (Doxis AI.dp) |
|---|---|---|
| Bounding boxes (word/line level) | Yes (word/line level, Surya OCR) | n/a (IDP suite) |
| Sandwich PDF / searchable archive PDF | Yes — searchable archive PDF | no PaperOffice-style self-service sandwich PDF |
| Click-to-evidence / visual validation (HITL) | Yes — click-to-evidence / HITL | suite/project dependent |
| Structured IDP fields (ready types) | ~30 ready types incl. DATEV/ZUGFeRD | 50+ document types, 150+ fields (vendor claim) |
| DMS/archive included (WORM, audit, legal hold) | Yes — WORM, audit trail, legal hold | after acquisition: module in ECM suite (SER/Doxis) |
| E-signatures on the same document | Yes — on the same document object | n/a |
| Native MCP server (tool count) | Yes — 165+ DMS tools (MCP) | no — not PaperOffice MCP |
| EU inference on owned hardware | Yes — owned EU GPU hardware | EU hosting (vendor claim) |
| Self-service without cloud setup | Yes — token in minutes | sales-led quote; EUR 25 test credit |
| Price / 1,000 pages (extraction only) | Basic €30 / Premium €40 / Ultra €100 per 1,000 pages (3/4/10¢) | no public per-document price — quote; SLA billed separately (Capterra feedback) |
Source: https://www.klippa.com/en/dochorizon/ (Eigenangaben) + docuclipper.com (Rebrand-Chronik), retrieved 08/2026. Prices may change.
Acquisition by SER 03/2025, rebrand Doxis AI.dp 03/2026. Related comparison: Doxis AI.dp (same corporate group). Angle: transparent per-page vs quote pricing + suite lock-in.
Transparent list price — margin for qualified partners and integrators.
The path to 70% goes through partnership: first become a partner (40%), then Elite qualification. This also applies to direct customers with their own volume.
The margin compensates integration, first-level support and solution ownership. Direct customers pay the same list price — nobody pays more because of the partner model.
Klippa: invoice/OCR focus — PaperOffice as IDP plus DMS/HITL/MCP under one token. Archive readiness depends on geometry. Versus Klippa (klippa), the first question is whether word/line geometry and a searchable sandwich PDF exist on the object. Visual HITL highlights uncertain fields directly on the scan page. In parallel: Line boxes drive layout reconstruction on multi-column delivery notes.
Agents write back where Klippa only returns JSON. Signature links are created on the object without opening a second vendor account. Reminders and signature status use the same object ID as IDP.
Sovereignty versus Klippa: Competitor quotas and region locks drop out as an ops risk. Additionally Hardware utilization is plannable — not tied to foreign GPU spot prices.
Invoice extraction
curl -X POST "https://api.paperoffice.ai/latest/job/add/workflow" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer po_sk_xxx" \
-F "[email protected]" \
-F "model=premium" \
-F "idp_collection=invoice"
# danach job_result pollen (job_id aus Response)import requests
api_token = "po_sk_xxx"
file_path = "invoice.pdf"
create = requests.post(
"https://api.paperoffice.ai/latest/job/add/workflow",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {api_token}"},
files={"file": open(file_path, "rb")},
data={"model": "premium", "idp_collection": "invoice"},
)
print(create.json()){
"status": "success",
"job_id": "job_…",
"result": { "fields": { "invoice_number": "…" } }
}Full parameters: llms-full.txt / Postman.
Yes. PaperOffice AI can be evaluated as an alternative to Klippa — along extraction, EU inference, DMS/WORM and MCP, API-first and without disparagement.
PaperOffice lists AI DMS/IDP transparently: Basic 3¢, Premium 4¢, Ultra 10¢ per page. List prices for Klippa are stated only with an official source and retrieval date — otherwise “n/a”.
Typical cutover from Klippa: send the same files to PaperOffice workflows (e.g. idp_collection=invoice), run in parallel, then cut over. llms-full.txt: job/workflow.
PaperOffice processes on EU infrastructure on owned hardware. Versus Klippa, residency and inference are stated only with verifiable facts.
Ready IDP pipelines (incl. invoice) plus DMS/HITL/MCP versus Klippa — not raw extraction only.
The first step is partnership (40% margin) via the partner application. The Elite tier (70%) is evaluated individually from within the active partner program. The margin compensates integration, first-level support and solution ownership — direct customers pay the same list price.
SER acquisition 03/2025, rebrand to Doxis AI.dp 03/2026. The product line sits in the Doxis/SER ECM suite. Related comparison: Doxis AI.dp.
Related alternatives in the same category.
Doxis: ECM suite with partner channel — PaperOffice as token start and per-page instead of seat projects.
PaperOffice vs Doxis (Doxis AI.dp / Klippa) →Konfuzio: IDP plus full DMS with transparent per-page pricing.
PaperOffice vs Konfuzio →Rossum: Invoice IDP plus DMS, signatures and MCP in one API.
PaperOffice vs Rossum →ABBYY: Modern REST+MCP stack instead of legacy SDK integration.
PaperOffice vs ABBYY →Mistral OCR 4: strong paragraph boxes — PaperOffice: word/line boxes, sandwich PDF, IDP, DMS/WORM, HITL, MCP.
PaperOffice vs Mistral OCR 4 →Azure Document Intelligence (Form Recognizer): geometry yes — PaperOffice adds sandwich PDF, WORM and MCP.
PaperOffice vs Azure AI Document Intelligence →Get a token, review pricing, compare the feature matrix.
