Nettstedskart Nettstedskart Oppdateringer Oppdateringer
Norsk
NOK kr
Oppdateringer
NYTT
Claude & ChatGPT — Supercharged.
Alle dokumenter · 350+ AI-verktøy · 30 sek oppsett
Claude· ChatGPT· Cursor· Gemini· +50
Koble til nå
AI-DMS
50+ AI-moduler og verktøy
Løsninger
Bransjer, prosesser, risikoer
Ressurser
Veiledninger, blogg, støtte
Developer
API, SDK-er, dokumentasjon
Partnere
Integrator & Reseller — apply in the app
Selskap
Team, careers, contact
Priser

vs Doxis (Doxis AI.dp / Klippa)

PaperOffice AI vs Doxis

Doxis: ECM suite with partner channel — PaperOffice as token start and per-page instead of seat projects.

Overview

PaperOffice AI compares with Doxis along license model, API-first and compliance — without disparagement. This page compares PaperOffice with Doxis based on facts and without disparagement — ECM suite with partner channel — PaperOffice as token start and per-page instead of seat projects.

  • PaperOffice vs Doxis: API-first with EU hosting and credits from 3¢/page.
  • Comparison to Doxis without disparagement — criteria: API-first, compliance, TCO.
  • Enterprise DMS: Doxis vs self-service token, API-first and native WORM/GoBD.

Open the Klippa DocHorizon comparison →

Comparison table

Unverified competitor data appears as “n/a”.

Criterion PaperOffice Doxis (Doxis AI.dp / Klippa)
Bounding boxes (word/line level) Yes (word/line level, Surya OCR) n/a
Sandwich PDF / searchable archive PDF Yes — searchable archive PDF n/a
Click-to-evidence / visual validation (HITL) Yes — click-to-evidence / HITL n/a
Structured IDP fields (ready types) ~30 ready types incl. DATEV/ZUGFeRD n/a
DMS/archive included (WORM, audit, legal hold) Yes — WORM, audit trail, legal hold n/a
E-signatures on the same document Yes — on the same document object n/a
Native MCP server (tool count) Yes — 165+ DMS tools (MCP) n/a
EU inference on owned hardware Yes — owned EU GPU hardware n/a
License model Per-page / credits (list price) n/a
API-first / headless Yes — REST + MCP n/a
Setup Self-service token n/a
Price / 1,000 pages (extraction only) Basic €30 / Premium €40 / Ultra €100 per 1,000 pages (3/4/10¢) n/a

Competitor details only with a verified official source. Unverified fields appear as “n/a”.

Doxis AI.dp is the former Klippa DocHorizon (SER acquisition 03/2025, rebrand 03/2026). Related comparison: Klippa DocHorizon. Further Doxis facts are pending.

Pricing model with qualification tiers

Transparent list price — margin for qualified partners and integrators.

  • List price Basic 3¢ / Premium 4¢ / Ultra 10¢ per page
  • Partner tier (integrator) 40% margin — entry via the partner application
  • Elite tier 70% margin — reachable from within the partner program, evaluated individually

The path to 70% goes through partnership: first become a partner (40%), then Elite qualification. This also applies to direct customers with their own volume.

The margin compensates integration, first-level support and solution ownership. Direct customers pay the same list price — nobody pays more because of the partner model.

Key differences

Doxis (Doxis AI.dp / Klippa)

  • Doxis (Doxis AI.dp / Klippa): focus on storage, sync or classic DMS/ECM — Document Ops and MCP are often add-ons.
  • Doxis: ECM suite with partner channel — PaperOffice as token start and per-page instead of seat projects.
  • List prices only with a verified official source.

PaperOffice AI

  • API-first + MCP-native (same Bearer as REST).
  • Per-page / credits from 3¢ (Basic / Premium / Ultra).
  • EU hosting, WORM/GoBD, legal hold and audit trail natively.

Three decision axes

1

Bounding boxes & sandwich PDF versus Doxis

Doxis: ECM suite with partner channel — PaperOffice as token start and per-page instead of seat projects. When evaluating Doxis (doxis), teams check: Versus Doxis (doxis), the first question is whether word/line geometry and a searchable sandwich PDF exist on the object. Operationally: Word boxes make amount fields clickable and evidence extraction for controllers. and Multi-page contracts keep page context per box for review queues.

2

One token for IDP, DMS, HITL, signature and MCP — difference vs Doxis

Email validation and device checks share the same Bearer as Document Ops. That keeps the doxis comparison honest: full stack instead of an endpoint. After extraction the same token starts HITL review and creates WORM.

3

Owned GPU hardware instead of Doxis vendor regions

Audit trail and WORM native — sovereignty answer to Doxis: Inference runs on owned GPU hardware in the EU — without mandatory hyperscaler IAM. Compliance questions (WORM, legal hold) are answered by the platform directly.

Migration in 3 steps

Import & Migration API — documented in llms-full.txt.

01

Inventory from Doxis

Prepare documents and metadata from Doxis for ZIP/scan-source import (no price assumptions).

02

Import job in PaperOffice

Upload via the Import API and poll status — can run in parallel with Doxis.

03

Workflows & MCP

After cutting over from Doxis: connect HITL workflows and MCP tools on the same Bearer.

FAQ

Is PaperOffice a Doxis alternative?

Yes. PaperOffice AI can be evaluated as an alternative to Doxis — along license, self-service, GoBD/WORM and agents, API-first and without disparagement.

What does PaperOffice cost compared to Doxis?

PaperOffice lists AI DMS/IDP transparently: Basic 3¢, Premium 4¢, Ultra 10¢ per page. List prices for Doxis are stated only with an official source and retrieval date — otherwise “n/a”.

How do I migrate from Doxis to PaperOffice?

From Doxis: prepare inventory as ZIP/scan source, start an import job, then workflows/MCP on the same token. No mandatory partner project. llms-full.txt: Import & Migration.

Where is data processed — differently from Doxis?

PaperOffice processes on EU infrastructure on owned hardware. Versus Doxis, residency and inference are stated only with verifiable facts.

Does switching from Doxis require a partner project?

Moving from Doxis typically starts with token + Import API — self-service instead of a mandatory project.

How does one reach the 70% partner margin?

The first step is partnership (40% margin) via the partner application. The Elite tier (70%) is evaluated individually from within the active partner program. The margin compensates integration, first-level support and solution ownership — direct customers pay the same list price.

Is Doxis AI.dp the same as Klippa DocHorizon?

Yes: after the SER acquisition (03/2025) and rebrand (03/2026). Details and API-first angle in the Klippa DocHorizon comparison.

More comparisons

Related alternatives in the same category.

vs DocuWare

DocuWare: named-user annual + partner project — PaperOffice: self-service token + per-page (model comparison).

PaperOffice vs DocuWare →

vs Paperless-ngx

Paperless-ngx: For teams needing GoBD/WORM and IDP: managed Document Ops instead of self-hosting maintenance.

PaperOffice vs Paperless-ngx →

Try PaperOffice live

Get a token, review pricing, compare the feature matrix.