LlamaParse
- LlamaParse: parsing API. PaperOffice: the parse result becomes a permissioned archive object with MCP.
vs LlamaParse
LlamaParse splits files for RAG; PaperOffice files the result in an audit-proof archive.
Made for real business. Not for hype.
In the same account
AI OCR with bounding boxes — 69 types, fields with location.
from €6 per 1,000 pages
Seamless in the job path — task and document also on mobile.
Web + Mobile
SES signatures from the same credit balance.
SES from the balance
Audit-proof filing and audit trail.
included
Public PAYG/credit prices per page; the table shows the billing model (as of 09/2026).
| Criterion | PaperOffice | LlamaParse |
|---|---|---|
| Bounding boxes (word/line level) | Yes (word/line level, Surya OCR) | Yes — word/line coordinates |
| Sandwich PDF / searchable archive PDF | Yes — searchable archive PDF | n/a |
| Click-to-evidence / visual validation (HITL) | Yes — click-to-evidence / HITL | n/a |
| Structured IDP fields (ready types) | Zero-shot: any document type, 120+ languages | Yes — agentic parsing/extraction |
| DMS/archive included (WORM, audit, legal hold) | Yes — WORM, audit trail, legal hold | no — parse/extract endpoint, external archive required |
| E-signatures on the same document | Yes — on the same document in the archive | no |
| Native MCP server (tool count) | Yes — 300+ API/MCP Tools | Yes — MCP server (parse/extract), no DMS |
| EU inference on owned hardware | Yes — owned EU GPU hardware | US vendor — no owned EU inference |
| Self-service without cloud setup | Yes — token in minutes | API key and your own orchestration |
| Pricing model | One credit balance for all features: from €6.00–€60.00 per 1,000 pages by quality tier | LlamaCloud: credits per page (free tier + PAYG); pure parse/extract/index stack (US), no DMS/archive |
| List price per 1,000 pages | Basic €20.00 / Premium €60.00 / Ultra €200.00 per 1,000 pages (2/6/20¢) | PAYG per page (parsing only) |
| Billing | from €6.00 per 1,000 pages (Elite) — same scale on every tier | n/a |
Source: https://developers.llamaindex.ai/llamaparse/general/pricing/, retrieved 09/2026. Prices may change.
LlamaParse is a trademark of its respective owner. PaperOffice is not affiliated with or endorsed by LlamaParse. Competitor details are based on publicly available sources (as of 08/2026) and are provided without warranty.
Our prices are public — including partner terms.
Unit: Price per 1,000 pages
| Tier | Elite Partner (−70%) | Partner (−40%) | Enduser |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | €6.00 | €12.00 | €20.00 |
| Premium | €18.00 | €36.00 | €60.00 |
| Ultra | €60.00 | €120.00 | €200.00 |
Billing is internal in credits; amounts follow the selected currency (base: list price).
Elite terms after qualification — criteria and program are public: Pricing · Partner program
Teams that need LlamaParse only as a parser in front of their own vector index, and already pay Azure or LlamaCloud, often stay on the parser. PaperOffice keeps extraction, archive, rights and agents on the same document.
When API-first, credits and MCP without a client or suite mandate matter, PaperOffice is the better fit.
Trusted by leading companies worldwide
Teams that need LlamaParse only as a parser in front of their own vector index, and already pay Azure or LlamaCloud, often stay on the parser. PaperOffice keeps extraction, archive, rights and agents on the same document.
LlamaParse: this page does not invent list prices. PaperOffice bills credits — Basic 2¢, Premium 6¢, Ultra 20¢ per page, with public partner terms.
LlamaParse splits files for RAG; PaperOffice files the result in an audit-proof archive. PaperOffice runs its own EU servers and files the result in an audit-proof way.
https://api.paperoffice.ai/latest/docs/llms-full.txt Or connect directly: MCP server for Claude, Cursor and ChatGPT →
Invoice extraction
curl -X POST "https://api.paperoffice.ai/latest/job/add/workflow" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer po_sk_xxx" \ -F "file=@./invoice.pdf" \ -F "model=premium" \ -F "idp_collection=invoice" # danach job_result pollen (job_id aus Response) import requests api_token = "po_sk_xxx"
file_path = "invoice.pdf" create = requests.post( "https://api.paperoffice.ai/latest/job/add/workflow", headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {api_token}"}, files={"file": open(file_path, "rb")}, data={"model": "premium", "idp_collection": "invoice"},
)
print(create.json()) { "status": "success", "job_id": "job_…", "result": { "fields": { "invoice_number": "…" } }
} Full parameters: llms-full.txt / Postman.
Yes — when the need versus LlamaParse is capture, understanding, archive and action in one account, not a single step. The table above compares point by point.
Basic 2¢, Premium 6¢, Ultra 20¢ per page — PaperOffice’s price list is public. LlamaParse also has public PAYG/credit prices per page; PaperOffice adds the whole stack (DMS, WORM archive, HITL, MCP, EU inference) in the same per-page billing.
LlamaParse primarily solves the core job described on this page. PaperOffice keeps extraction, archive (WORM), permissions, HITL and MCP on the same document — with a public per-page price list.
From LlamaParse: prepare inventory as ZIP/scan source, start an import job, then workflows via REST and MCP. No mandatory partner project. llms-full.txt: Import & Migration.
On our own servers in the EU — including audit-proof filing and an audit trail. Where LlamaParse processes data is documented by the vendor.
Moving from LlamaParse typically starts with token + Import API — self-service instead of a mandatory project. Fastest with llms-full.txt.
Another comparison in the same category as LlamaParse.
PaperOffice vs Azure AI Document Intelligence →Another comparison in the same category as LlamaParse.
PaperOffice vs Google Document AI →Another comparison in the same category as LlamaParse.
PaperOffice vs AWS Textract →Another comparison in the same category as LlamaParse.
PaperOffice vs Reducto →Another comparison in the same category as LlamaParse.
PaperOffice vs Unstructured →Another comparison in the same category as LlamaParse.
PaperOffice vs LandingAI ADE →Get a token, review pricing, compare the feature matrix.