Microsoft SharePoint
- SharePoint: libraries and Microsoft 365 permissions. IDP, WORM and MCP are other products — not the same record.
vs Microsoft SharePoint
SharePoint organises libraries; PaperOffice turns files into governed document operations.
Made for real business. Not for hype.
API output from July 14, 2026
Source document (invoice) · from €6 per 1,000 pages
Extracted fields · from €6 per 1,000 pages
Header fields
Line items (3)
| # | SKU | Description | Unit | Qty | Rate | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITEM-92912 | Multifold paper towels (case, 16 packs) | case | 40 | $42.11 | $1,684.40 |
| 2 | PN-61493 | Foaming hand soap refill, 1200 mL (case of 4) | case | 4 | $38.81 | $155.24 |
| 3 | PART-33106 | 55-gallon trash can liners (case of 100) | case | 9 | $53.07 | $477.63 |
LLM fields — natural language
Accounts payable
Prompt
Based on the total amount, check whether this invoice exceeds the dual-control limit of USD 2,000 and therefore needs a second approval.
Result
Yes — USD 2,527.98 exceeds USD 2,000. Second approval required.
Document INV-59762 · field _total_amount
KYC / HR / legal capacity
Prompt
Based on the date of birth on the ID document, check whether the person is of legal age (18) as of today.
Result
Yes — date of birth 12 Mar 2004 → of legal age on the reference date (22 years).
ID / passport pipeline · LLM field instead of a fixed template key
Compliance / vendor screening
Prompt
Based on supplier name and address, check whether the issuer is located in the USA and must be treated as a third-country vendor for EU booking.
Result
Yes — Pristine Galvan Inc., Cleveland OH (USA). Third country / US vendor.
Document INV-59762 · address + company name via LLM prompt
Agent UI: extracted data (raw JSON)
JSON excerpt (7 fields + 3 line items)
{
"_supplier_name": {
"value": "Pristine Galvan Inc.",
"value_raw": "Pristine Galvan Inc."
},
"_invoice_number": {
"value": "INV-59762",
"value_raw": "INV-59762"
},
"_invoice_date": {
"value": "07/07/2026",
"value_raw": "2026-07-07"
},
"_currency": {
"value": "USD",
"value_raw": "USD"
},
"_net_amount": {
"value": "$2,317.27",
"value_raw": "2317.27"
},
"_vat_amount": {
"value": "$162.21",
"value_raw": "162.21"
},
"_total_amount": {
"value": "$2,527.98",
"value_raw": "2527.98"
},
"_line_items": [
{
"sku": "ITEM-92912",
"description": "Multifold paper towels (case, 16 packs)",
"qty": 40,
"unit": "case",
"rate": "$42.11",
"amount": "$1,684.40",
"amount_raw": "1684.40"
},
{
"sku": "PN-61493",
"description": "Foaming hand soap refill, 1200 mL (case of 4)",
"qty": 4,
"unit": "case",
"rate": "$38.81",
"amount": "$155.24",
"amount_raw": "155.24"
},
{
"sku": "PART-33106",
"description": "55-gallon trash can liners (case of 100)",
"qty": 9,
"unit": "case",
"rate": "$53.07",
"amount": "$477.63",
"amount_raw": "477.63"
}
]
} In the same account
AI OCR with bounding boxes — 69 types, fields with location.
from €6 per 1,000 pages
Seamless in the job path — task and document also on mobile.
Web + Mobile
SES signatures from the same credit balance.
SES from the balance
Audit-proof filing and audit trail.
included
Details for Microsoft SharePoint from a public vendor source, as of 08/2026.
| Criterion | PaperOffice | Microsoft SharePoint |
|---|---|---|
| Bounding boxes (word/line level) | Yes (word/line level, Surya OCR) | n/a — public sources used here do not specify word-level bounding boxes for Microsoft SharePoint |
| Sandwich PDF / searchable archive PDF | Yes — searchable archive PDF | Sandwich PDF is not documented as a PaperOffice archive PDF for Microsoft SharePoint |
| Click-to-evidence / visual validation (HITL) | Yes — click-to-evidence / HITL | Visual HITL for Microsoft SharePoint is not documented as click-to-evidence on this page |
| Structured IDP fields (ready types) | 69 ready document types incl. DATEV/ZUGFeRD/XRechnung | Ready IDP document types for Microsoft SharePoint are not documented as a public specification on this page (as of 08/2026) |
| DMS/archive included (WORM, audit, legal hold) | Yes — WORM, audit trail, legal hold | Versioning and retention in M365 — not PaperOffice WORM on the extraction object |
| Native MCP server (tool count) | Yes — 300+ API/MCP Tools | PaperOffice MCP: only in PaperOffice, not part of SharePoint |
| EU inference on owned hardware | Yes — owned EU GPU hardware | Microsoft cloud regions selectable — not owned PaperOffice GPUs in the EU |
| API-first / headless | Yes — REST + MCP | Graph/SharePoint API exists — headless IDP and MCP are not the core |
| Setup | Self-service token | Tenant, sites, permissions — often with a Microsoft partner, not a token start |
| Pricing model | One credit balance for all features: from €6.00–€60.00 per 1,000 pages by quality tier | Microsoft SharePoint: no PaperOffice-verified public package prices |
| Billing | from €6.00 per 1,000 pages (Elite) — same scale on every tier | n/a |
| NAS integration | Sole official DMS partner for QNAP and ASUSTOR | n/a |
Source: https://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-365/sharepoint/compare-sharepoint-plans, retrieved 08/2026.
Microsoft SharePoint is a trademark of its respective owner. PaperOffice is not affiliated with or endorsed by Microsoft SharePoint. Competitor details are based on publicly available sources (as of 08/2026) and are provided without warranty.
Our prices are public — including partner terms.
Unit: Price per 1,000 pages
| Tier | Elite Partner (−70%) | Partner (−40%) | Enduser |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | €6.00 | €12.00 | €20.00 |
| Premium | €18.00 | €36.00 | €60.00 |
| Ultra | €60.00 | €120.00 | €200.00 |
Billing is internal in credits; amounts follow the selected currency (base: list price).
Elite terms after qualification — criteria and program are public: Pricing · Partner program
Teams that need Microsoft 365 as intranet and library — co-authoring in Word/Excel, Teams, lists as system of record — stay on SharePoint. That is collaboration, not an IDP archive.
When API-first, credits and MCP without a client or suite mandate matter, PaperOffice is the better fit.
Được tin tưởng bởi các công ty hàng đầu trên toàn thế giới
Teams that need Microsoft 365 as intranet and library — co-authoring in Word/Excel, Teams, lists as system of record — stay on SharePoint. That is collaboration, not an IDP archive.
Microsoft SharePoint: this page does not invent list prices. PaperOffice bills credits — Basic 2¢, Premium 6¢, Ultra 20¢ per page, with public partner terms.
SharePoint organises libraries; PaperOffice turns files into governed document operations. PaperOffice runs its own EU servers and files the result in an audit-proof way.
https://api.paperoffice.ai/latest/docs/llms-full.txt Or connect directly: MCP server for Claude, Cursor and ChatGPT →
Import & Migration API — documented in llms-full.txt.
Prepare documents and metadata from Microsoft SharePoint for ZIP/scan-source import.
Upload via the Import API and poll status — can run in parallel with Microsoft SharePoint.
After cutting over from Microsoft SharePoint: connect HITL workflows and MCP on the same access path.
Yes — when the need versus Microsoft SharePoint is capture, understanding, archive and action in one account, not a single step. The table above compares point by point.
Basic 2¢, Premium 6¢, Ultra 20¢ per page — the price list is public. Microsoft SharePoint list prices appear only when documented; otherwise the table shows n/a.
Microsoft SharePoint primarily solves the core job described on this page. PaperOffice keeps extraction, archive (WORM), permissions, HITL and MCP on the same document — with a public per-page price list.
From Microsoft SharePoint: prepare inventory as ZIP/scan source, start an import job, then workflows via REST and MCP. No mandatory partner project. llms-full.txt: Import & Migration.
On our own servers in the EU — including audit-proof filing and an audit trail. Where Microsoft SharePoint processes data is documented by the vendor.
Moving from Microsoft SharePoint typically starts with token + Import API — self-service instead of a mandatory project. Fastest with llms-full.txt.
DocuWare compared: extraction and archive in one system — or separate worlds?
PaperOffice vs DocuWare →Paperless-ngx: For teams needing GoBD/WORM and IDP: managed Dokumentprozesse instead of self-hosting maintenance.
PaperOffice vs Paperless-ngx →ELO: partner sales — PaperOffice: self-service token.
PaperOffice vs ELO →d.velop: named user + partner — PaperOffice: per-page self-service.
PaperOffice vs d.velop →amagno: magnet filing — PaperOffice: LLM IDP + DMS.
PaperOffice vs Amagno →M-Files: named-user subscription on request — PaperOffice: API-first/headless + per-page self-service.
PaperOffice vs M-Files →Get a token, review pricing, compare the feature matrix.